Fix Job arrays exceeding queueSize (#5920) #6345
Merged
+137
−1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes issue where job arrays bypassed
executor.queueSize
limits, causing resource overallocation. Previously, a job array would count as only 1 task against the queue limit regardless of its actual array size.Before:
process.array = 30
+executor.queueSize = 40
→ up to 70 concurrent tasksAfter:
process.array = 30
+executor.queueSize = 40
→ max 40 concurrent tasks (respects queue limit)Root Cause
The original
canSubmit()
method only checkedrunningQueue.size() < capacity
, treating job arrays as single tasks. This allowed arrays to exceed intended resource limits.Solution
Core Changes
IllegalArgumentException
if array size exceeds total queue capacitycheckQueueCapacity()
helper while preserving original ternary structureImplementation Details
The
checkQueueCapacity()
method:Test Coverage
Added comprehensive tests using Spock's parameterized testing with 12 new test cases covering:
Backward Compatibility
✅ Fully backward compatible - no breaking changes:
executor.queueSize = 0
) works as beforeRelated