Additional lidar_handler to set the timestamp of the pointcloud from specific rotation angle #73
+34
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…a specific rotation angle. This enable better synchronisation to other sensors
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related Issues & PRs
Summary of Changes
I added an additional
lidar_handlerwhich enables the user to precisely set the point cloud time stamp to a specific rotation angle (within configured azimuth range).This helps if one would like to sync a camera with the LiDAR.
E.g. If the camera is triggered at 270deg of LiDAR rotation. The user could now set
time_reference_angle:=270.0and the published point cloud will be stamped with the time when it swiped the 270° and hence exactly when the camera was triggered.In combination with phase_lock this is quite handy. Comparable to an issue within the velodyne driver: ros-drivers/velodyne#242
Validation
I tested it with an OS0-128 with FW 2.4
If an azimuth range is configured and the user provided time_reference_angle is out of range it will fall back to the default driver behavior.
I hope you see the benefit this provides for many real life applications.
Looking forward to discuss 😃