Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: regenerating types after removing ObjectOrUserset from API #173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

willvedd
Copy link
Contributor

@willvedd willvedd commented Jun 20, 2024

Description

ObjectOrUserset was removed in #171 but types were not regenerated. This PR introduces those chagnes.

References

Original PR: #171

Review Checklist

  • I have clicked on "allow edits by maintainers".
  • I have added documentation for new/changed functionality in this PR or in a PR to openfga.dev [Provide a link to any relevant PRs in the references section above]
  • The correct base branch is being used, if not main
  • I have added tests to validate that the change in functionality is working as expected

@willvedd willvedd requested a review from a team as a code owner June 20, 2024 18:25
@rhamzeh
Copy link
Member

rhamzeh commented Jun 20, 2024

@willvedd can you make sure you are updating the swagger file too?

@rhamzeh
Copy link
Member

rhamzeh commented Jun 20, 2024

We should probably hav a CI job that blocks PRs that don't regen the protos and the swagger

@willvedd
Copy link
Contributor Author

We should probably hav a CI job that blocks PRs that don't regen the protos and the swagger

We actually had that for the swagger file but not for the generated types. I opened #174 to address this. Once this PR gets merged in, that PR should begin passing all checks!

@willvedd willvedd merged commit ed30a57 into main Jun 20, 2024
7 checks passed
@willvedd willvedd deleted the fix-regenerating-types-removing-objectoruserset branch June 20, 2024 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants