Skip to content

fix: remove duplicate markdown_edited save request [Teak] #2127

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release/teak
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kdmccormick
Copy link
Member

Removes the unnecessary duplicate save request of markdown_edited value to the backend.

Part of: #2099
Backports: 62589ae , from #2112

Removes the unnecessary duplicate save  request of markdown_edited
value to the backend.

Part of: openedx#2099
Backports: 62589ae
@kdmccormick kdmccormick changed the title fix: remove duplicate markdown_edited save request fix: remove duplicate markdown_edited save request [Teak] Jun 10, 2025
@kdmccormick
Copy link
Member Author

@bradenmacdonald I think Anas is offline, can you review this backport?

I haven't tested yet. Would you be willing to include this commit into #2098 , and then I'll make a PR sandbox against that branch and test both at once?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (release/teak@fcdf1fd). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             release/teak    #2127   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   93.88%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?     1148           
  Lines                   ?    24036           
  Branches                ?     5083           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    22567           
  Misses                  ?     1401           
  Partials                ?       68           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bradenmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor

Sure, done.

bradenmacdonald added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
* fix: enable markdown editor for problems in libraries too

This fix is also achieved on master via 5991fd3 / #2068 but this is a simpler fix, not a direct backport of that refactor.

* fix: remove duplicate markdown_edited save request (#2127)

Removes the unnecessary duplicate save  request of markdown_edited
value to the backend.

Part of: #2099
Backports: 62589ae

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhammad Anas <[email protected]>
ihor-romaniuk pushed a commit to raccoongang/frontend-app-authoring that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2025
* fix: enable markdown editor for problems in libraries too

This fix is also achieved on master via 5991fd3 / openedx#2068 but this is a simpler fix, not a direct backport of that refactor.

* fix: remove duplicate markdown_edited save request (openedx#2127)

Removes the unnecessary duplicate save  request of markdown_edited
value to the backend.

Part of: openedx#2099
Backports: 62589ae

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhammad Anas <[email protected]>
ihor-romaniuk pushed a commit to raccoongang/frontend-app-authoring that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
* fix: enable markdown editor for problems in libraries too

This fix is also achieved on master via 5991fd3 / openedx#2068 but this is a simpler fix, not a direct backport of that refactor.

* fix: remove duplicate markdown_edited save request (openedx#2127)

Removes the unnecessary duplicate save  request of markdown_edited
value to the backend.

Part of: openedx#2099
Backports: 62589ae

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhammad Anas <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants