Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚠️ Decoupling IPAM from CAPM3 #1442

Conversation

peppi-lotta
Copy link
Member

@peppi-lotta peppi-lotta commented Feb 6, 2024

These changes fix the issues produced by this PR in CAPM3

Signed-off-by: peppi-lotta <[email protected]>
@metal3-io-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mboukhalfa for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@metal3-io-bot metal3-io-bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 6, 2024
@Rozzii
Copy link
Member

Rozzii commented Feb 15, 2024

/cc @lentzi90 @zaneb @kashifest @schrej

Copy link
Member

@tuminoid tuminoid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nits.

BTW, the link in PR summary links to a check in a PR, not to PR itself.

- capm3
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line feed missing.

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: ipam-controller-manager
namespace: capm3-system
namespace: ipam-provider-m3-system
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is one weird name. Is there reasoning behind that? I expected to see simple ipam-system or similar

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. Suggested ipam-metal3-system in the IPAM PR

@peppi-lotta peppi-lotta marked this pull request as draft May 7, 2024 12:48
@metal3-io-bot metal3-io-bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 7, 2024
@metal3-io-bot metal3-io-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates that a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 30, 2024
@metal3-io-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Rozzii Rozzii added this to the 1.8.0 milestone Jun 28, 2024
@peppi-lotta
Copy link
Member Author

#1993
This PR is doing the same thing as this. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates that a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: Done / Closed
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants