-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 248
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[query] Move LoweredTableReaderCoercer into ExecuteContext #14696
Open
ehigham
wants to merge
1
commit into
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
Choose a base branch
from
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
base: ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+358
−375
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Sep 20, 2024
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
This was referenced Sep 20, 2024
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
October 1, 2024 19:45
f2c39a6
to
2f3f122
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
October 1, 2024 19:45
16d54bd
to
82cd91b
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
October 1, 2024 20:03
2f3f122
to
b02c83b
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
October 1, 2024 20:03
82cd91b
to
63191ba
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
October 8, 2024 19:19
b02c83b
to
20e6520
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
October 8, 2024 19:19
63191ba
to
dded098
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
October 8, 2024 20:30
20e6520
to
e66b858
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
October 8, 2024 20:30
dded098
to
4f3a6e3
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
October 16, 2024 20:02
e66b858
to
49bdf73
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
October 16, 2024 20:02
4f3a6e3
to
db7595e
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
October 16, 2024 21:30
49bdf73
to
0ce4a09
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
October 16, 2024 21:30
db7595e
to
9615ece
Compare
1 task
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
October 17, 2024 15:00
0ce4a09
to
3a671ee
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
October 17, 2024 15:00
9615ece
to
1951717
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
October 21, 2024 15:24
3a671ee
to
ee01140
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
October 21, 2024 15:25
1951717
to
3f89fe2
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
October 21, 2024 18:50
ee01140
to
22c3b9b
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
October 21, 2024 18:50
3f89fe2
to
1d6e424
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
January 22, 2025 15:50
220a71a
to
bbbea4f
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 22, 2025 15:51
9922a19
to
cf90a1c
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
January 22, 2025 16:46
bbbea4f
to
db27b14
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 22, 2025 16:46
cf90a1c
to
b9c311f
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/http-like-rpc
branch
from
January 22, 2025 17:30
db27b14
to
3eae5a8
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 22, 2025 21:13
4c724ba
to
df36f36
Compare
ehigham
changed the base branch from
ehigham/http-like-rpc
to
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
January 22, 2025 21:13
1 task
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
branch
from
January 24, 2025 20:54
234a058
to
804d4fa
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 24, 2025 20:54
df36f36
to
51edeb7
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
branch
from
January 27, 2025 23:15
804d4fa
to
dd7471c
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 27, 2025 23:15
51edeb7
to
07eaf29
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
branch
from
January 29, 2025 19:00
dd7471c
to
0b07e0a
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 29, 2025 19:00
07eaf29
to
006475e
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
branch
from
January 29, 2025 20:21
0b07e0a
to
4b12f9a
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 29, 2025 20:22
006475e
to
8330580
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
branch
from
January 29, 2025 20:39
4b12f9a
to
f455097
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 29, 2025 20:39
8330580
to
d7b182d
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
branch
from
January 29, 2025 21:40
f455097
to
f8830d3
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 29, 2025 21:40
d7b182d
to
d1cf72f
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
branch
from
January 30, 2025 19:52
f8830d3
to
0ab8b01
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 30, 2025 19:52
d1cf72f
to
cf11bbe
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
branch
from
January 31, 2025 19:12
0ab8b01
to
9d5cf6c
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 31, 2025 19:12
cf11bbe
to
aa8477e
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
branch
from
January 31, 2025 19:27
9d5cf6c
to
dde4ab0
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 31, 2025 19:27
aa8477e
to
490b5a6
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-persisted-ir
branch
from
January 31, 2025 21:21
dde4ab0
to
071d613
Compare
ehigham
force-pushed
the
ehigham/ctx-coercer-cache
branch
from
January 31, 2025 21:21
490b5a6
to
fcdedec
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refactored table reader coercion and caching mechanism.
What changed?
shouldCacheQueryInfo
method fromBackend
classCoercerCache
inExecuteContext
LoweredTableReader.makeCoercer
to return a function instead of a classGenericTableValue
andLoweredTableReader
NoCaching
utilityWhy make this change?
This change aims to optimize table reader coercion by:
ExecuteContext