Update phrasing a bit

eeps/eep-0072.md

@@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ defining records. Since usage of the syntax for getting, setting, matching, etc
 (e.g. `#rec{a=x,y=b}`) occurs far more commonly than defining, it only feels
 natural that the definition syntax would mirror usage.
 
-Further, the syntax in Erlang's type system to define records also matches the
-newly proposed define syntax.
+For more symmetry, the syntax in Erlang's type system to define records also
+matches the newly proposed define syntax.
 
 Thus, I feel that sharing the existing usage and type syntax with the
 definition system would likely become the default/preferred way, and that the