Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MINOR: Eliminate warnings for AdminUtils #16470

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 30, 2024
25 changes: 24 additions & 1 deletion core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/admin/AdminRackAwareTest.scala
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ package kafka.admin

import kafka.utils.{CoreUtils, Logging}
import org.apache.kafka.admin.{AdminUtils, BrokerMetadata}
import org.apache.kafka.common.errors.InvalidReplicationFactorException
import org.apache.kafka.common.errors.{InvalidPartitionsException, InvalidReplicationFactorException}
import org.apache.kafka.server.common.AdminOperationException
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions._
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -225,4 +226,26 @@ class AdminRackAwareTest extends RackAwareTest with Logging {
val actualAssignment = CoreUtils.replicaToBrokerAssignmentAsScala(AdminUtils.assignReplicasToBrokers(brokerMetadatas, 10, 3, 0, -1))
assertEquals(expectedAssignment, actualAssignment)
}

@Test
def testAssignReplicasToBrokersWithInvalidParameters(): Unit = {
val rackMap = Map(0 -> "rack1", 1 -> "rack3", 2 -> "rack3", 3 -> "rack2", 4 -> null)
val brokerMetadatas = toBrokerMetadata(rackMap)

// test 0 partition
assertThrows(classOf[InvalidPartitionsException],
() => AdminUtils.assignReplicasToBrokers(brokerMetadatas, 0, 0, -1, -1))

// test 0 replication factor
assertThrows(classOf[InvalidReplicationFactorException],
() => AdminUtils.assignReplicasToBrokers(brokerMetadatas, 10, 0, -1, -1))

// test wrong replication factor
assertThrows(classOf[InvalidReplicationFactorException],
() => AdminUtils.assignReplicasToBrokers(brokerMetadatas, 10, brokerMetadatas.size() + 1, -1, -1))

// test wrong brokerMetadatas
assertThrows(classOf[AdminOperationException],
() => AdminUtils.assignReplicasToBrokers(brokerMetadatas, 10, brokerMetadatas.size(), -1, -1))
}
}
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/admin/RackAwareTest.scala
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ trait RackAwareTest {

def toBrokerMetadata(rackMap: Map[Int, String], brokersWithoutRack: Seq[Int] = Seq.empty): util.Collection[BrokerMetadata] = {
val res = rackMap.toSeq.map { case (brokerId, rack) =>
new BrokerMetadata(brokerId, Optional.of(rack))
new BrokerMetadata(brokerId, Optional.ofNullable(rack))
} ++ brokersWithoutRack.map { brokerId =>
new BrokerMetadata(brokerId, Optional.empty())
}.sortBy(_.id)
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -130,8 +130,6 @@ public static Map<Integer, List<Integer>> assignReplicasToBrokers(Collection<Bro
return assignReplicasToBrokersRackUnaware(nPartitions, replicationFactor, brokerMetadatas.stream().map(b -> b.id).collect(Collectors.toList()), fixedStartIndex,
startPartitionId);
else {
if (brokerMetadatas.stream().anyMatch(b -> !b.rack.isPresent()))
throw new AdminOperationException("Not all brokers have rack information for replica rack aware assignment.");
return assignReplicasToBrokersRackAware(nPartitions, replicationFactor, brokerMetadatas, fixedStartIndex,
startPartitionId);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -166,7 +164,7 @@ private static Map<Integer, List<Integer>> assignReplicasToBrokersRackAware(int
int fixedStartIndex,
int startPartitionId) {
Map<Integer, String> brokerRackMap = new HashMap<>();
brokerMetadatas.forEach(m -> brokerRackMap.put(m.id, m.rack.get()));
brokerMetadatas.forEach(m -> brokerRackMap.put(m.id, m.rack.orElseThrow(() -> new AdminOperationException("Not all brokers have rack information for replica rack aware assignment."))));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please add UT for it? AdminRackAwareTest is a good class to have the new test.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please add UT for it? AdminRackAwareTest is a good class to have the new test.

I have added a new unit test for it. If there are any areas that could be improved, please provide me with some guidance and suggestions.

int numRacks = new HashSet<>(brokerRackMap.values()).size();
List<Integer> arrangedBrokerList = getRackAlternatedBrokerList(brokerRackMap);
int numBrokers = arrangedBrokerList.size();
Expand Down