Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed the issue in strings/join.py #12434

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 29, 2024

Conversation

RajdeepBakolia2004
Copy link
Contributor

@RajdeepBakolia2004 RajdeepBakolia2004 commented Dec 13, 2024

The issue was that join() function was not working as the join method of string due to strip method which truncates from end
now whenever we have empty strings in our separated list it was just adding multiple terminator and all the terminator where getting strip which was different form the join method so a for loop was run for the entire list except the last element in which case it just add the last element and it also take care of the case when the list is empty

It fixes the bug in the join.py file

Fixes #12408

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Add or change doctests? -- Note: Please avoid changing both code and tests in a single pull request.
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass and removed tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass labels Dec 13, 2024
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Dec 29, 2024
@MaximSmolskiy
Copy link
Member

Added corresponding doctest

@MaximSmolskiy
Copy link
Member

@RajdeepBakolia2004 Please fill pull_request_template that I added to the end of your PR description

@cclauss We don't have any problems with automatic PRs closing by the robot if there is no template or nothing is filled in there? My PR #12450 was closed as invalid when I forgot to fill template, but I see some opened recent PRs with the same problem

Copy link
Member

@MaximSmolskiy MaximSmolskiy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix my comment above

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added awaiting changes A maintainer has requested changes to this PR and removed awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Dec 29, 2024
@RajdeepBakolia2004
Copy link
Contributor Author

RajdeepBakolia2004 commented Dec 29, 2024 via email

@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Dec 29, 2024

We want PRs to be autoclosed for no checkboxes are checked to limit spam PRs. Maintainers should be able to reopen closed PRs.

@MaximSmolskiy
Copy link
Member

We want PRs to be autoclosed for no checkboxes are checked to limit spam PRs. Maintainers should be able to reopen closed PRs.

@cclauss But why PR #12455 with no checkboxes are checked was not autoclosed?

Copy link
Member

@MaximSmolskiy MaximSmolskiy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@RajdeepBakolia2004 Thanks for fix, tried to make it more elegant and shorter

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the awaiting changes A maintainer has requested changes to this PR label Dec 29, 2024
@MaximSmolskiy MaximSmolskiy merged commit 972a5c1 into TheAlgorithms:master Dec 29, 2024
5 checks passed
@RajdeepBakolia2004
Copy link
Contributor Author

RajdeepBakolia2004 commented Dec 29, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

strings/join.py is incorrect
3 participants