docs(paper): correct stale README (byline set; workshop bib is a copy, not a symlink)#199
Merged
Merged
Conversation
… not a symlink) The paper byline is now set (Richard Abrich, OpenAdapt / MLDSAI Inc.), so the README's "no named byline" note and "replace the contributor placeholder" submission blocker were stale. Also corrects the build note: the workshop shares references.bib via a byte-identical regular-file copy (de-symlinked in #189 so the sdist packages cleanly and check_artifacts.py asserts they stay identical), not a symlink as the README claimed. Docs-only; no LaTeX or benchmark change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NyCHrzA1psrKMFfroYbzaM
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Docs-only correction to
paper/README.mdfound during an arXiv-readiness review of the paper package.Three stale/incorrect statements fixed:
references.bib(via a symlink)". It was de-symlinked in fix(ci): unblock main — de-symlink workshop bib (sdist) + deterministic pixel font test #189 (a symlink member breaks the sdist packaging gate);check_artifacts.pynow asserts the two bib files stay byte-identical. Corrected the note to match reality.Verification
python paper/check_artifacts.py->paper artifact constants: OKmake -C paper-> full reportbuild/main.pdf(10 pages) + workshopworkshop/build/main.pdf(6 pages), both clean, exit 0.No LaTeX source, benchmark artifact, or headline number changed.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01NyCHrzA1psrKMFfroYbzaM