Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

buck2: 2024-10-15 -> 2025-01-02 #370393

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

thoughtpolice
Copy link
Member

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@nickgerace
Copy link
Contributor

nickgerace commented Jan 2, 2025

I am trying to test this PR, but I think I am running into Mic92/nixpkgs-review#447 due to the recent infrastructure changes (#355847). I'll try again when I'm back at my desk.

@lucasew
Copy link
Contributor

lucasew commented Jan 3, 2025

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 370393


x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • buck2

@nickgerace
Copy link
Contributor

The Eval / Tag check appears to be incorrect and may be related to the ongoing infrastructure changes. Everything looks good to me and is accordance to previous PRs for this package. I'm going to attempt to merge.

@nickgerace
Copy link
Contributor

@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge

@nixpkgs-merge-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nickgerace merge not permitted (#305350):
pkgs/development/tools/build-managers/buck2/default.nix is not in pkgs/by-name/
pkgs/development/tools/build-managers/buck2/hashes.json is not in pkgs/by-name/

@nickgerace
Copy link
Contributor

nickgerace commented Jan 3, 2025

@thoughtpolice hmmm I'm wondering if the repository structure changed post 24.11?
#370393 (comment)

@nickgerace
Copy link
Contributor

nickgerace commented Jan 3, 2025

Ah it seems like that's the case.

I think once we adhere to new paradigm, we should be good to go.

@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice force-pushed the aseipp/push-yqlzpoynnwov branch from b048fbc to 4ff3bcd Compare January 3, 2025 22:12
@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice merged commit 4bc2a5f into NixOS:master Jan 3, 2025
22 checks passed
@thoughtpolice thoughtpolice deleted the aseipp/push-yqlzpoynnwov branch January 3, 2025 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants