feat: add backtesting mode w/ silverback test command
#174
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fubuloubu
commented
Nov 24, 2024
|
edit: decided not to use FORK_MODE with this feature |
fubuloubu
force-pushed
the
feat/add-backtesting
branch
from
3cc8392 to
0d36142
Compare
fubuloubu
force-pushed
the
feat/add-backtesting
branch
2 times, most recently
from
12c43b1 to
98e053e
Compare
|
saw some issues that led to ApeWorX/ape#2548 but not a blocker |
fubuloubu
force-pushed
the
feat/add-backtesting
branch
from
5ac42ac to
541f22d
Compare
fubuloubu
force-pushed
the
feat/add-backtesting
branch
from
541f22d to
e20002e
Compare
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did
No issue for it, but being able to test bots under real (historical) scenarios is really, really useful
How I did it
Extensive use of Ape fork networks
How to verify it
Write some tests!
Checklist