-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 748
ascanrulesBeta: Add Example Alerts to InsecureHttpMethodScanRule #6871
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Brandosp
wants to merge
1
commit into
zaproxy:main
Choose a base branch
from
Brandosp:Brando-Test
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This still needs to be extracted to its own method, it's also missing the webdav which IMO should have its own ref (i.e the one in line 569 should be replaced with two build/raise calls in lines 545 and 569, having all the data already filled in).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, not exactly sure what you mean by this. I began working on the code based off this comment, and I added to the buildHttpMethodAlert method to check whether or not the httpMethod is part of WEBDAV or not to give webdav its own alert ref
String alertRef = getId() + "-5"; if (WEBDAV_METHODS.contains(httpMethod)) { alertRef = getId() + "-6"; }You mentioned adding two build/raise calls in line 545 and 569 which I assume this means I should create a buildAlert for specifically WEBDAV but I found this confusing as the main logic filters the data for whether the httpmethod is part of WEBDAV or not making it so the build call on 569 would create distinct alerts, so I imagine my assumption is wrong?
Additionally, when u mention extracting to its own method, do u mean creating a buildExampleAlert helper which would just use the code I have in the getExampleAlerts for the HttpMethodAlert, and then simply calling that helper function to make the code more structured?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are two issues:
getExampleAlerts()should not be duplicating what the main code is doing, both should call a common method. If tomorrow we change the description/other info of the lines 553 and 559, this example alert will keep returning the old/different description/other info. We should not need to manually keep main code and examples in sync. Also, note this issue is already happening withbuildInsecureHttpMethodAlert, the example alert has the wrong description/other info.