Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

phc: add metrics for number of unhealthy endpoints #3040

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MustafaSaber
Copy link
Member

related to #2346

@MustafaSaber MustafaSaber added the minor no risk changes, for example new filters label Apr 25, 2024
@MustafaSaber MustafaSaber self-assigned this Apr 25, 2024
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ func (h *healthyEndpoints) filterHealthyEndpoints(ctx *context, endpoints []rout
if p < dropProbability {
ctx.Logger().Infof("Dropping endpoint %q due to passive health check: p=%0.2f, dropProbability=%0.2f",
e.Host, p, dropProbability)
metrics.IncCounter("passive-health-check.endpoints.dropped")
metrics.IncCounter("passive-health-check.requests.dropped")
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Renamed this one, I think it's more descriptive right now

endpoints = p.fadein.filterFadeIn(endpoints, rt)
endpoints = p.heathlyEndpoints.filterHealthyEndpoints(ctx, endpoints, p.metrics)
p.metrics.UpdateGauge("passive-health-check.endpoints.dropped", float64(beforefiltering-len(endpoints)))
Copy link
Member Author

@MustafaSaber MustafaSaber Apr 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After some discussions with @RomanZavodskikh, this gauge will be overwritten by different services(requests), for example svc A has 2 unhealthy endpoints and svc B has 1 both will write on the same metric.

What we can do is append routeId or Name+Namespace combination. we aren't sure that's a good thing memory wise, wdyt @AlexanderYastrebov @szuecs?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the 2 options the better is to use routeId, because Kubernetes data is 1) not available and 2) often not applicable (what about non-kubernetes dataclients?).
Another way would be to have passive-health-check.endpoints.dropped.<endpoint> and Gauge is 0 or 1 and then the query would be sum() to get all current dropped endpoints.

In any case it seems that we need to add some unbounded memory usage and we should think, if we need this at all or if we start by only logs that log the endpoint.

Signed-off-by: Mustafa Abdelrahman <[email protected]>
@MustafaSaber MustafaSaber marked this pull request as draft April 26, 2024 18:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
minor no risk changes, for example new filters
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants