Improve doctypes in copilot

[hlohaus]

No description provided.

[g4f-copilot]

Hi H Lohaus,

Thank you for your contribution to the project with the pull request titled "Improve doctypes in copilot". It's great to see active engagement and improvements from our community.

I will be reviewing your pull request and may leave a few comments on the files you've modified. Here are some initial observations:

1. Typo Correction and Clarification: I appreciate the correction of the typo in the get_pr_details function and the added clarity in the function descriptions. Clear documentation is crucial for maintainability and usability.

2. Argument Documentation: The addition of Args in the docstrings provides a clearer understanding of the function parameters, which is a great enhancement.

3. Return Type Description: Updating the return type descriptions enhances the clarity, making it easier for new contributors to understand the codebase.

4. Additional Docstrings: The introduction of new docstrings for functions like read_json and read_text is commendable. This not only helps in understanding the function's purpose but also in maintaining the code effectively.

5. Type Annotations: The use of type annotations, such as in get_ai_response, improves the code readability and is a good practice in Python programming.

6. Functionality Check: I'll be closely reviewing the changes to ensure that they align with the existing functionality and do not introduce any regressions.

7. Code Style and Standards: Your changes seem to follow the project's coding standards well. Consistency in coding style is essential for a collaborative project.

8. Testing: I will check if additional tests are needed for the changes made or if existing tests cover the new modifications.

In summary, your pull request looks promising. I'll proceed with a more detailed review of the code changes and provide specific feedback if necessary.

Thanks again for your valuable contribution!

Best regards,
[Your Name]