Add new client to call organization discovery configuration API

[Yasasr1]

Proposed changes in this pull request

This PR adds a new client to call the organization discovery configuration API in order to retrieve the discovery configurations of a specific organization

When should this PR be merged

This should be merged after all prs of the below task is merged.

• Introduce a new configuration to enable email domain based organization discovery for self-registration product-is#21572

Related issue

• Introduce a new client to call organization discovery configuration API from the recovery portal. product-is#21595

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 67.74194% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 40.61%. Comparing base (b777be3) to head (8d44d69).
Report is 190 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rganizationDiscoveryConfigDataRetrievalClient.java	77.77%	4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...onDiscoveryConfigDataRetrievalClientException.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #6099      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     40.27%   40.61%   +0.33%     
- Complexity    14430    14602     +172     
============================================
  Files          1760     1768       +8     
  Lines        119036   122277    +3241     
  Branches      21144    20533     -611     
============================================
+ Hits          47947    49665    +1718     
- Misses        63779    65233    +1454     
- Partials       7310     7379      +69     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	25.00% <67.74%> (+0.15%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[omindu]

Can we check for a different dependency for this. Within the framework ? Since we are planning to move away from axis2 in the future, we should try to minimize any usages for the new developments

[Yasasr1]

This was used only to import a authorization header constant. Can use a local constant instead. Updated with 8d44d69

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud