fix(plugin-meetings): improve error handling for stream state ended #3975
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more). |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts (2)
Line range hint
4-4: Reminder: Address the TODO comment.The TODO comment indicates that tests are missing for this function. Please ensure that the additional parameter change is thoroughly tested to confirm that it behaves as expected.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
12-24: Consider adjusting the fee structure or discount policy.The implementation of a flat $20 fee on discounted bills could negate the benefit of the discount, especially for smaller purchases or marginal loyalty tiers. This might lead to customer dissatisfaction, as the intent to reward loyalty paradoxically increases the bill.
Consider revising either the discount percentages or the flat fee application to better align with customer incentives.
Would you like assistance in generating a revised implementation?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-2: LGTM!
The function logic is correct and implementation is accurate.
Line range hint 6-6: Verify the latest stable versions and any security advisories
Ensure that the fixed version of the requests library is secure and free from vulnerabilities.
Run the following script to verify the fixed version of the requests library:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts (1)
8733-8738: Consider optimizing the stream validation loop.While the current implementation works correctly, it could be improved for better performance and readability:
- Add early returns for empty/undefined streams
- Use Array.prototype.find() to detect first invalid stream
Here's a suggested optimization:
- for (const {stream, name} of streamChecks) { - if (stream?.readyState === 'ended') { - throw new Error( - `Attempted to publish ${name} stream with ended readyState, correlationId=${this.correlationId}` - ); - } - } + const invalidStream = streamChecks.find(({stream}) => stream?.readyState === 'ended'); + if (invalidStream) { + throw new Error( + `Attempted to publish ${invalidStream.name} stream with ended readyState, correlationId=${this.correlationId}` + ); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/@webex/plugin-meetings/src/meeting/index.ts (1)
8726-8731: LGTM! Well-structured stream validation setup.
The streamChecks array is well organized and provides a clean way to validate multiple stream types. The code is readable and maintainable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's a nice and needed improvement. Thanks for raising this PR, @rarajes2. Good one 💪🏻
COMPLETES #< SPARK-579391 >
This pull request addresses
While debugging the Instant connect issue, we found that throwing a generic error for all types of streams was not helpful during investigation. This PR handles all the streams individually keeping the old logic aligned and throws the error with specific detail about the stream.
by making the following changes
The error thrown will contain the info about which stream caused it to throw the error, providing better logs to debug.
Change Type
The following scenarios were tested
Tested the logic in isolation. Error message is being thrown as expected.
I certified that
I have read and followed contributing guidelines
I discussed changes with code owners prior to submitting this pull request
I have not skipped any automated checks
All existing and new tests passed
I have updated the documentation accordingly
Make sure to have followed the contributing guidelines before submitting.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes