feat: Result of conformance testing by Hitachi #48
Conversation
|
Someone is attempting to deploy a commit to the wbcsd Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
raimundo-henriques
requested review from
raimundo-henriques
and removed request for
raimundo-henriques
| }, | ||
| "test_result": "passed", | ||
| "test_date": "2023-05-26T06:52:00Z", | ||
| "pathfinder_version": "1.0.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "pathfinder_version": "1.0.0" | |
| "pathfinder_version": "1.0.1" |
Thank you for creating this PR, @mill6-plat6aux.
Your other conformance testing results are mentioning 1.0.1. Did you perform the conformance testing against Pathfinder Tech Specs Version 1.0.0 or 1.0.1?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As you said, the pathfinder_version for the past two tests was 1.0.1, which was an incorrect 1.0.0.
Therefore, the description of the test by Hitachi is correct. Conversely, I would like to correct the pathfinder_version of the test by zeroboard and boost technologies to 1.0.0, should I correct the file and send the pull request again?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mill6-plat6aux - answering on behalf of @zeitgeist . Yes please submit either 1 PR with both the files changed for boost and zeroboard OR
individual PRs for Zeroboard and boost.
Either option works for us!
Thanks for your help!
No description provided.