run operators #5872

Performance Regression: -67.73%

⚡ 1 improvement
❌ 24 regressions
✅ 1229 untouched
⏩ 623 skipped¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(1000, 10000)]`	78.5 µs	91.2 µs	-13.92%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(2000, 10000)]`	86.5 µs	101.9 µs	-15.1%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(3333, 10000)]`	98.3 µs	115.4 µs	-14.8%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(5000, 10000)]`	113.3 µs	132 µs	-14.18%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(2500, 10000)]`	91.2 µs	106.8 µs	-14.6%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_varbinview[(1000, 10000)]`	190.8 µs	591.3 µs	-67.73%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_varbinview[(2000, 10000)]`	301.3 µs	642.1 µs	-53.07%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_varbinview[(2500, 10000)]`	358.2 µs	692.8 µs	-48.3%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_varbinview[(5000, 10000)]`	638.2 µs	945.2 µs	-32.47%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_varbinview[(3333, 10000)]`	452 µs	777 µs	-41.83%
❌	`old_raw_prim_test_between[f64, 2048]`	100.1 µs	111.4 µs	-10.12%
❌	`old_raw_prim_test_between[i32, 2048]`	94.8 µs	106.2 µs	-10.73%
❌	`old_raw_prim_test_between[f32, 2048]`	95.4 µs	106.7 µs	-10.61%
❌	`old_raw_prim_test_between[i64, 2048]`	101 µs	113.2 µs	-10.78%
❌	`old_raw_prim_test_between[u32, 2048]`	95.5 µs	107.4 µs	-11.09%
❌	`canonicalize_compare[(1000, 4, 4)]`	163.8 µs	223.3 µs	-26.66%
❌	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768]`	509.8 µs	650.4 µs	-21.61%
❌	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 32768]`	210 µs	268.5 µs	-21.78%
❌	`old_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 2048]`	134 µs	150.3 µs	-10.83%
❌	`old_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768]`	500.8 µs	593.3 µs	-15.6%
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

623 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩