Skip to content

Conversation

@arpitkh101
Copy link
Contributor

@arpitkh101 arpitkh101 commented Dec 3, 2025

This PR removes forced None assignment for deprecated PassConfig flags, as discussed in #29646. Forcing deprecated flags to None doesn't prevent their use and can be confusing.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request removes the lines that force deprecated PassConfig flags to None after their values have been processed. While the intention is to reduce confusion for users inspecting the configuration, this change removes a safety measure that prevents accidental use of deprecated flags elsewhere in the code. This increases the risk of future bugs and inconsistencies. I've left a comment explaining why the original behavior is safer and should be retained.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Copy link
Member

@hmellor hmellor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

That's a nice improvement to the hash behaviour

@hmellor hmellor enabled auto-merge (squash) December 4, 2025 00:22
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Dec 4, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@ProExpertProg ProExpertProg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM apart from one nit

@hmellor hmellor merged commit dfdda96 into vllm-project:main Dec 4, 2025
48 checks passed
PatrykSaffer pushed a commit to PatrykSaffer/vllm that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2025
charlotte12l pushed a commit to charlotte12l/vllm that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants