Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Infrastructure improvements - Migration to Java 11 from Java 8 #368

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: jena4-upgrade
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Infrastructure improvements - Migration to Java 11 from Java 8 #368

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
9234b50
Adding the variable display
michel-heon Feb 22, 2023
50d0595
Change project.version to 1.14.1-SNAPSHOT
michel-heon Feb 22, 2023
3a43423
Adding an echo mechanism for properties
michel-heon Feb 22, 2023
59fa166
This code segment is compatible with Java 11 and not compatible with
michel-heon Feb 22, 2023
def3890
""
michel-heon Feb 22, 2023
7896a33
Replacing
michel-heon Feb 22, 2023
9fc52e7
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
1c7dde2
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
8ebc531
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
85d558e
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
46a5149
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
ef11d69
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
271978b
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
1c2564d
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
42f31dd
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
27725b0
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
dbd162e
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Feb 25, 2023
3d5b754
Updated enforcer-version to (3.2.1) to be compatible with VIVO pom's -
michel-heon Feb 27, 2023
56d2f83
Update pom.xml
michel-heon Mar 2, 2023
c0e5c8d
Update api/pom.xml
michel-heon Mar 2, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions api/src/test/java/compilation/IsNotCompatibleWithJava8.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
package compilation;

import static org.junit.Assert.*;

import org.junit.Test;

public class IsNotCompatibleWithJava8 {
/*
* This code segment is compatible with Java 11 and not compatible with java 8. It will abort the compilation if the Java context is version 8
*/
@Test
public void test() {
String value = "This code is compiled in Java 11";
System.out.println(value.isBlank());
}
Comment on lines +11 to +15
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand this. Maybe this might be useful - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14572287/testing-different-java-versions-in-junit#answer-14573109

Copy link
Member Author

@michel-heon michel-heon Mar 2, 2023 •
edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@chenejac
This class uses a method (isBlank()) which is available only in JAVA 11. In java 8 the compilation sends an incompatibility message on the method.
The stackoverfow proposal is also very good. You just have to locate the right class to implement it. Do you have any suggestion ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need a test for that. I would suggest to remove it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The question is in which scenario someone can run tests using JDK 8, when we are requesting 11 in pom.xml file. It is of course possible, but completely out of VIVO installation/building procedure, should we take care in that case? Anyway, if some test is needed, it shouldn't just print some message, we need assertion (probably in this case assertFalse(value.isBlank()), but not sure what will happen in JDK 1.8 case).


}
4 changes: 1 addition & 3 deletions installer/pom.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,8 +23,6 @@
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<source>1.8</source>
<target>1.8</target>
<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
</configuration>
</plugin>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -76,7 +74,7 @@
</plugin>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-enforcer-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.4.1</version>
<version>3.2.1</version>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion installer/webapp/pom.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
<goal>unpack</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<artifactItems>
<artifactItems>
<artifactItem>
<groupId>${project.groupId}</groupId>
<artifactId>${project.artifactId}</artifactId>
Expand Down
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions pom.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
<maven-site-plugin.skip>false</maven-site-plugin.skip>
<stagingBase>/</stagingBase>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
<maven.compiler.release>11</maven.compiler.release>
</properties>

<modules>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -255,8 +256,6 @@
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<source>1.8</source>
<target>1.8</target>
<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
<compilerArgs>
<arg>-XDcompilePolicy=simple</arg>
Expand Down