Adding transaction_call endpoint

[otherview]

Description

This PR adds a new endpoint that allows to simulate and estimate based on transactions instead of clauses.
The added value is to bring api communication to the transaction level. This allows for gotchas like, chaintag, expiration, nonce, etc to be more visible and allows executing transactions in a given block revision

Summary of the endpoint:

URL :         POST /transactions/call?revision=best
Payload :   transaction.Transaction (existing type)
Response:   transaction.CallReceipt (transaction.Receipt minus Block info)
type CallReceipt struct {
	GasUsed  uint64                `json:"gasUsed"`
	GasPayer thor.Address          `json:"gasPayer"`
	Paid     *math.HexOrDecimal256 `json:"paid"`
	Reward   *math.HexOrDecimal256 `json:"reward"`
	Reverted bool                  `json:"reverted"`
	TxID     thor.Bytes32          `json:"txID"`
	TxOrigin thor.Address          `json:"txOrigin"`
	Outputs  []*Output             `json:"outputs"`
	VmError  string                `json:"vmError"`
}

Goal: Execute a transaction at the head of a specified block. Retrieve the total gas cost at the transaction level.
(Note: Can be expanded to execute in a block at a given tx position.)

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

• Tests

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• New and existing E2E tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
• I have not added any vulnerable dependencies to my code

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 38.19742% with 144 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 61.83%. Comparing base (f1aa5ae) to head (8ff45c0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
runtime/runtime.go	0.00%	78 Missing ⚠️
api/transactions/types.go	62.16%	25 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
runtime/resolved_tx.go	0.00%	23 Missing ⚠️
api/transactions/transactions.go	75.43%	8 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
api/api.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #832      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.14%   61.83%   -0.32%     
==========================================
  Files         204      204              
  Lines       18859    19084     +225     
==========================================
+ Hits        11720    11800      +80     
- Misses       6040     6176     +136     
- Partials     1099     1108       +9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been marked as stale due to inactivity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.