OpEx: Practitioners' email address, as defined in each of their cases #5574
Conversation
…'s email did not update correctly
| pract => pract.userId === practitionerId, | ||
| ); | ||
| if (practitionerObj && practitionerObj.email) { | ||
| practitionersEmailInCases[practitionersCase.docketNumber] = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it possible to have a duplicate docketNumber (e.g., maybe missing distinguishing suffixes)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Even for docket numbers that have suffixes, the docketNumber.S field will not contain the suffix. The suffix is stored separately in the docketNumberSuffix.S field and a composite of the docket number and suffix is stored as docketNumberWithSuffix.S for good measure.
Because the docket number (without suffix) is used as the pk/sk for a case, there won't be duplicates.
If, however, it happens that the same practitioner can somehow be in a given case's [irs|private]Practitioners array twice, the .find() a few lines above will settle for the first match it comes across.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Got it--great explanation, thank you!
Added a report that will show what email address is defined for a given practitioner in each of the cases they are associated with. This is intended to be used by a human to manually determine if any cases failed to update after a practitioner updates their email address.