Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3 process updates #20

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Apr 24, 2024
Merged

Run3 process updates #20

merged 16 commits into from
Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

mafrahm
Copy link
Contributor

@mafrahm mafrahm commented Jan 12, 2024

  • updates the 13 TeV ttbar cross section
  • adds some 13.6 TeV cross sections (Higgs + ttbar)
  • some configuration changes for hh2bbww processes

@mafrahm mafrahm requested a review from riga January 12, 2024 10:51
@riga
Copy link
Member

riga commented Jan 29, 2024

Is this ready for review @mafrahm ?

@riga riga self-assigned this Jan 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@nprouvost nprouvost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

General comments:

  • Add revision/version number for the links
  • Add comments on which higgs mass is used for the cross sections of the higgs samples
  • I would recommend to use the values for mH=125 GeV such that such a value exists for each process (e.g. 125.09 is not given for the di-higgs processes) and because most MC samples are produced for a Higgs mass value for 125GeV, changing the shape of the the distribution. An other possibility would be to verify for each sample which Higgs mass value was used for the sample production and get the cross sections for this value. However, this might be disadvantageous if some samples have different Higgs mass value over the different years.

cmsdb/processes/ewk.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/ewk.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/higgs.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@nprouvost nprouvost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated comments with suggestions

cmsdb/processes/ewk.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/ewk.py Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/higgs.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/higgs.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/higgs.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/higgs.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/higgs.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/higgs.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/higgs.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@aalvesan aalvesan self-requested a review February 15, 2024 09:27
cmsdb/processes/top.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/top.py Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/top.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/top.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/top.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmsdb/processes/qcd.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@riga
Copy link
Member

riga commented Mar 11, 2024

@nprouvost @aalvesan Did the above commits resolve your review comments?

@mafrahm mafrahm requested review from aalvesan and nprouvost April 24, 2024 08:28
@mafrahm mafrahm merged commit 74ee175 into master Apr 24, 2024
15 checks passed
@mafrahm mafrahm deleted the run3_process_updates branch April 24, 2024 10:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants