Bump com.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle from 13.0.0 to 13.1.0

[dependabot]

Bumps com.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle from 13.0.0 to 13.1.0.

Release notes

Sourced from com.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle's releases.

checkstyle-13.1.0

Checkstyle 13.1.0 - https://checkstyle.org/releasenotes.html#Release_13.1.0

Breaking backward compatibility:

#12556 - Remove deprecated method CheckstyleAntTask:createClasspath()

New:

#18329 - ImportControl: add module attribute to allow/disallow module imports #18368 - New check: MissingOverrideOnRecordAccessor to require Override on record component accessor methods

Bug fixes:

#16087 - false positive invalid tag JavadocType #18790 - IllegalTokenText reports false positives for Unicode whitespace characters without escape sequences #18118 - Inconsistent behaviour of Indentation check #13038 - VariableDeclarationUsageDistanceCheck doesn't handle method definition properly #11103 - Indentation: Lambda in Enum causes error loop #18644 - False-negative: SummaryJavadoc:forbiddenSummaryFragments for tab-formatted code #6807 - False-positive RightCurly in google_checks since 8.20 #17561 - Google style: Override is required on explicitly declared accessor method for a record #18559 - Add missing checks to sun_checks.xml: DeclarationOrder, FallThrough, OneStatementPerLine

... (truncated)

Commits

• 079d68d [maven-release-plugin] prepare release checkstyle-13.1.0
• aa2d5a0 doc: release notes for 13.1.0
• a4873e0 Issue #18556: updating multifileregexpheader and adding external xml in check
• e4080e0 Issue #17882: added comments for SNIPPET_* tokens
• 30a2615 Pull #18795: Dedicate rewrite recipes #18794 #18673 #18791
• 5802cb8 Issue #15456: defining violation message visibility
• 9fd55e1 minor: setting lf line ending for InputJavadocTypeWithBlockComment.java
• 9f09882 Issue #7523: CLI '-s' option does not match by data from '-t'
• 40f2a1d Issue #17882: Add JAVADOC_INLINE_TAG_END token documentation
• 464188e Issue #16087: Refractor JavadocTypCheck
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[github-actions]

☀️   Quality Monitor

Tests

     Unit Tests (Whole Project): 100.00% successful (86 passed, 2 skipped)
   ⛔   Architecture Tests (Whole Project): 100.00% successful (17 passed, 2 skipped)

Coverage for New Code

   〰️   Line Coverage (Changed Code): n/a (0 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage (Changed Code): n/a (0 missed branches)
     Mutation Coverage (Changed Code): n/a (0 survived mutations)
   💪   Test Strength (Changed Code): n/a (0 survived mutations in tested code)

Coverage for Whole Project

   〰️   Line Coverage (Whole Project): 91.22% (64 missed lines)
   ➰   Branch Coverage (Whole Project): 90.45% (21 missed branches)
     Mutation Coverage (Whole Project): 84.38% (60 survived mutations)
   💪   Test Strength (Whole Project): 89.26% (39 survived mutations in tested code)

Style

     CheckStyle (Whole Project): No warnings
     PMD (Whole Project): No warnings
   ☕   Java Compiler (Whole Project): No warnings

Bugs

     SpotBugs (Whole Project): No bugs
   🐛   Error Prone (Whole Project): No bugs

API Problems

   🚫   Revapi (Whole Project): No warnings

Vulnerabilities

   🛡️   OWASP Dependency Check (Whole Project): No vulnerabilities

Software Metrics

   🌀   Cyclomatic Complexity (Whole Project): 377 (total)
   💭   Cognitive Complexity (Whole Project): 174 (total)
   ➿   N-Path Complexity (Whole Project): 341 (total)
   📏   Lines of Code (Whole Project): 4282 (total)
   📝   Non Commenting Source Statements (Whole Project): 1261 (total)
   🔗   Class Cohesion (Whole Project): 71.43% (maximum)
   ⚖️   Weight of Class (Whole Project): 100.00% (maximum)

🚦 Quality Gates

Overall Status: ✅ SUCCESS

✅ Passed Gates

• ✅ Overall Tests Success Rate: 100.00 >= 100.00
• ✅ Line Coverage in New Code: 100.00 >= 90.00
• ✅ Branch Coverage in New Code: 100.00 >= 90.00
• ✅ Mutation Coverage in New Code: 100.00 >= 90.00
• ✅ Potential Bugs in Whole Project: 0.00 <= 0.00
• ✅ Style Violation in Whole Project: 0.00 <= 0.00

---

Created by Quality Monitor v4.0.0 (#8f591a4). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.