Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new kwargs to VariantData rather than use defaults #1011

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

benjeffery
Copy link
Member

Fixes #1006

WIP - I wanted to get proof of principle before modifying the batch API where these will need to be passed through.

Copy link
Member

@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@benjeffery benjeffery force-pushed the no_defaults branch 3 times, most recently from 56c7104 to 973c12d Compare March 14, 2025 11:14
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.39%. Comparing base (a9eb102) to head (96dbcdf).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1011      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.40%   93.39%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        6492     6483       -9     
  Branches     1105     1103       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         6064     6055       -9     
  Misses        291      291              
  Partials      137      137              
Flag Coverage Δ
C 93.39% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
python 95.78% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@benjeffery benjeffery marked this pull request as ready for review March 14, 2025 11:43
@benjeffery
Copy link
Member Author

Now complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is it confusing that there are warnings about e.g. individuals_time in the simple usage docs?
2 participants