feat(platform-response-filter): expose only .transform method to facilitate OverrideProvider usage #2948
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Romakita has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (12)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant changes to the response handling and filtering mechanism across multiple packages. The primary modifications focus on simplifying the data processing logic by removing the serialization step and emphasizing direct data transformation. The changes affect the Changes
Possibly Related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Romakita
force-pushed
the
fix-expose-uniq-method-response-filter
branch
from
a0e668e to
09ad1dc
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
packages/platform/platform-http/src/common/services/PlatformHandler.ts(1 hunks)packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/index.ts(0 hunks)packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/services/PlatformResponseFilter.spec.ts(8 hunks)packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/services/PlatformResponseFilter.ts(2 hunks)packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/utils/renderView.spec.ts(0 hunks)packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/utils/renderView.ts(0 hunks)packages/third-parties/formio/src/components/AlterActions.ts(0 hunks)packages/third-parties/sse/src/domain/EventStreamContext.ts(1 hunks)packages/third-parties/sse/vitest.config.mts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/index.ts
- packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/utils/renderView.spec.ts
- packages/third-parties/formio/src/components/AlterActions.ts
- packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/utils/renderView.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/third-parties/sse/src/domain/EventStreamContext.ts
[error] 99-99: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/services/PlatformResponseFilter.spec.ts
[error] 379-379: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'actualError' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/services/PlatformResponseFilter.ts
[error] 30-30: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 32-32: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 68-68: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/third-parties/sse/vitest.config.mts (3)
13-13: Be mindful when lowering coverage thresholds for statements.
Lowering the statement coverage threshold from ~52.28 to 51.33 might reduce the rigor of testing. Consider verifying if the changes introduced in this PR justify decreasing the coverage threshold or if it would be better to refactor tests to maintain or improve coverage.
14-14: Reassess branch coverage threshold adjustments.
Similarly, reducing the branch coverage to 73.91 may diminish test thoroughness. Confirm if this is part of planned test coverage evolution or if the threshold decrease is temporary.
16-16: Ensure line coverage aligns with quality goals.
Reducing the line coverage threshold to 51.33 can indicate untested or under-tested code paths. Confirm whether these changes were offset by new testing strategies or if coverage levels need further enhancements.
packages/platform/platform-http/src/common/services/PlatformHandler.ts (1)
127-127: Verify removal of all serialize references
It appears the code no longer calls this.responseFilter.serialize, so let's confirm there are no lingering references that could cause confusion or break the new data transformation flow.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if there are any other references to serialize in the response filter related code.
Let me try one more search to get the complete context of the serialize usage.
serialize method still exists but is used internally - no action needed
The serialize method is still present in the PlatformResponseFilter class but it's now used internally as a protected method that gets called automatically when needed (for serializable data). The change from explicitly calling this.responseFilter.serialize to using this.responseFilter.transform is correct as transform will handle the serialization internally when required.
The only other references to serialize are:
- In the readme.md documentation which should be updated
- The actual implementation in PlatformResponseFilter.ts which is working as intended
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Searching for usage of `this.responseFilter.serialize` across the codebase
rg -A 3 'this\.responseFilter\.serialize'
Length of output: 433
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any serialize method definitions or references in response filter related files
fd -e ts -e js response.*filter --exec rg -i 'serialize' {}
Length of output: 292
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for serialize in response filter files with more context
rg -A 5 -B 5 'serialize' packages/platform/platform-response-filter/
Length of output: 6009
packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/services/PlatformResponseFilter.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/platform/platform-response-filter/src/services/PlatformResponseFilter.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Romakita
force-pushed
the
fix-expose-uniq-method-response-filter
branch
3 times, most recently
from
8d44c9e to
e5b6250
Compare
…litate OverrideProvider usage
Romakita
force-pushed
the
fix-expose-uniq-method-response-filter
branch
from
e5b6250 to
68df38b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🛑 Comments failed to post (1)
packages/platform/platform-http/test/integration/__fixtures__/inspectOperationsPaths.ts (1)
3-7: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider a fallback for missing operationPaths
Though
operationPathsis likely always available onendpoint, you may want to add a safeguard to handle unexpected scenarios gracefully.export function inspectOperationsPaths(endpoint: JsonMethodStore) { + if (!endpoint?.operationPaths) { + return []; + } return [...endpoint.operationPaths.values()].map(({method, path}) => ({ method, path })); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export function inspectOperationsPaths(endpoint: JsonMethodStore) { if (!endpoint?.operationPaths) { return []; } return [...endpoint.operationPaths.values()].map(({method, path}) => ({ method, path })); }
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 8.4.0 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests