Skip to content

Conversation

seveibar
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • add cn670 fixture for high density capacity node
  • add skipped test showing cn670 fails to route
  • update graphics-debug to latest version

Testing

  • bun test tests/bugs/cn670-not-routing.test.ts

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_b_6852d9553860832ea7532b04131b032a

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 18, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
capacity-node-autorouter ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 18, 2025 3:37pm

Comment on lines +1 to +130
{
"nodeId": "cn670",
"capacityMeshNode": {
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn670",
"center": {
"x": 12.0390625,
"y": 5.569687500000001
},
"width": 1.046875,
"height": 1.046875,
"layer": "top",
"availableZ": [0, 1],
"_depth": 5,
"_parent": {
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn668",
"center": {
"x": 11.515625,
"y": 6.093125000000001
},
"width": 2.09375,
"height": 2.09375,
"layer": "top",
"availableZ": [0, 1],
"_depth": 4,
"_parent": {
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn499",
"center": {
"x": 10.46875,
"y": 5.046250000000001
},
"width": 4.1875,
"height": 4.1875,
"layer": "top",
"availableZ": [0, 1],
"_depth": 3,
"_parent": {
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn6",
"center": {
"x": 12.5625,
"y": 2.9525000000000006
},
"width": 8.375,
"height": 8.375,
"layer": "top",
"availableZ": [0, 1],
"_depth": 2,
"_parent": {
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn4",
"center": {
"x": 8.375,
"y": 7.140000000000001
},
"width": 16.75,
"height": 16.75,
"layer": "top",
"availableZ": [0, 1],
"_depth": 1,
"_parent": {
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn0",
"center": {
"x": 0,
"y": -1.2349999999999994
},
"width": 33.5,
"height": 33.5,
"layer": "top",
"availableZ": [0, 1],
"_depth": 0,
"_containsTarget": true,
"_containsObstacle": true,
"_completelyInsideObstacle": false
},
"_containsObstacle": true,
"_targetConnectionName": "source_trace_14",
"_containsTarget": true,
"_completelyInsideObstacle": false
},
"_containsObstacle": true,
"_targetConnectionName": "source_trace_14",
"_containsTarget": true,
"_completelyInsideObstacle": false
},
"_containsObstacle": true,
"_targetConnectionName": "source_trace_10",
"_containsTarget": true,
"_completelyInsideObstacle": false
},
"_containsObstacle": true,
"_targetConnectionName": "source_trace_11",
"_containsTarget": true,
"_completelyInsideObstacle": false
},
"_containsObstacle": false
},
"nodeWithPortPoints": {
"capacityMeshNodeId": "cn670",
"portPoints": [
{
"x": 12.0390625,
"y": 5.046250000000001,
"z": 0,
"connectionName": "source_trace_12"
},
{
"x": 12.0390625,
"y": 6.093125000000001,
"z": 0,
"connectionName": "source_trace_12"
},
{
"x": 11.515625,
"y": 5.110083841463414,
"z": 1,
"connectionName": "source_trace_11"
},
{
"x": 11.515625,
"y": 5.569687500000001,
"z": 0,
"connectionName": "source_trace_11"
}
],
"center": {
"x": 12.0390625,
"y": 5.569687500000001
},
"width": 1.046875,
"height": 1.046875
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider renaming the file from cn670-nodeWithPortPoints.json to cn670-node-with-port-points.json to maintain consistency with kebab-case naming conventions that appear to be used in the project. This makes file naming more predictable across the codebase.

Spotted by Diamond (based on custom rules)

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2025

This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has had no recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant