Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feat][DTC-5411] updated jobs runner to be able to use temporal #204

Conversation

Sthakur27
Copy link

Updating env vars for retool onpremise to allow jobs runner to access temporal and turn into a internal onprem temporal worker.

https://linear.app/retool/issue/DTC-5411/update-docker-images-with-new-jobs-runner-env-vars

Copy link
Contributor

@avimoondra avimoondra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - any docs changes that should be paired with this?

Comment on lines 14 to 16
- WORKFLOW_TEMPORAL_CLUSTER_FRONTEND_HOST=temporal
- WORKFLOW_TEMPORAL_CLUSTER_FRONTEND_PORT=7233
- WORKFLOW_BACKEND_HOST=http://api:3000
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this included here? i think the comments from L17 to L25 should be pasted into the jobs-runner service definition?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and then jobs-runner should also be part of workflows network?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch, updated

Copy link

@alex-stabile alex-stabile left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we making these changes? I think we need to align with the rest of DTC on what the plan is here and why we're making these changes.

I also don't think we should "convert" jobs runner into a temporal worker. I like @roberto-retool 's suggestion here about adding source control to the temporal worker.

I don't see why we would update the public on-premise repo until we've validated our new setup with a customer

@Sthakur27 Sthakur27 marked this pull request as draft October 18, 2023 04:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants