feat: custom procedure with custom arguments #42
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MicBun
force-pushed
the
feat/customProcedureWithArgs
branch
2 times, most recently
from
64b15a6 to
6bf6702
Compare
MicBun
force-pushed
the
feat/customProcedureWithArgs
branch
from
6bf6702 to
34839c5
Compare
outerlook
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2025
|
@outerlook |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request introduces a new method to the
Streamclass in thesrc/contracts-api/stream.tsfile. The new method,customProcedureWithArgs, allows for executing custom procedures with specified arguments and returns the results in a specific format.Key changes:
src/contracts-api/stream.ts: Added thecustomProcedureWithArgsmethod to theStreamclass, which accepts a procedure name and a set of arguments. It executes the procedure and returns the result formatted asdateValueandvalue.Related Problem
resolves: #41
How Has This Been Tested?