Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Format #111

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 31, 2024
Merged

Format #111

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

JoshuaLampert
Copy link
Member

Maybe it's a good idea to also format P4est.jl. I excluded the wrapped file for now. I think most of it looks acceptable. What do you think, @sloede, @ranocha?

@sloede
Copy link
Member

sloede commented Jan 26, 2024

Maybe it's a good idea to also format P4est.jl. I excluded the wrapped file for now. I think most of it looks acceptable. What do you think, @sloede, @ranocha?

I think formatting is a good idea. I wouldn't format the wrapped file, since it is auto-generated, which makes it hard to compare it against changes once we have to re-generate it for some reason.

@JoshuaLampert
Copy link
Member Author

JoshuaLampert commented Jan 26, 2024

I think formatting is a good idea. I wouldn't format the wrapped file, since it is auto-generated, which makes it hard to compare it against changes once we have to re-generate it for some reason.

I think so, too. We could in principle format the file at the end of the generator, but I would still advocate for not formatting the wrapped file.

@JoshuaLampert
Copy link
Member Author

Again and again, we have a segfault when building the docs in CI. Do you know why?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (d25ad27) 17.64% compared to head (82ff687) 17.80%.

Files Patch % Lines
src/pointerwrappers.jl 92.59% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #111      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   17.64%   17.80%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines        1423     1427       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          251      254       +3     
- Misses       1172     1173       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 17.80% <92.86%> (+0.16%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

ranocha
ranocha previously approved these changes Jan 27, 2024
Copy link
Member

@ranocha ranocha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with what you have said above - good idea 👍

.github/workflows/FormtatCheck.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ranocha
Copy link
Member

ranocha commented Jan 27, 2024

Again and again, we have a segfault when building the docs in CI. Do you know why?

No idea, sorry. Looks like this has been happening for quite some time already...

Copy link
Member

@ranocha ranocha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I didn't check every line in the modified files but I think it should be fine

@JoshuaLampert
Copy link
Member Author

Are you fine with merging, @sloede?

Copy link
Member

@sloede sloede left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I only did a quick scan of the changes to test/, but nothing overly atrocious has caught my attention. LGTM, thanks!

@JoshuaLampert JoshuaLampert merged commit a84846b into main Jan 31, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@JoshuaLampert JoshuaLampert deleted the format branch January 31, 2024 13:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants