-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
macros: Improve IDE support #6968
Open
nurmohammed840
wants to merge
12
commits into
tokio-rs:master
Choose a base branch
from
nurmohammed840:macros
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+194
−176
Open
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d5f5c74
macros: Improve IDE support
nurmohammed840 e7518d0
macros: Improve IDE support
nurmohammed840 dae1ff7
fix: Revert span usage to restore type suggestions
nurmohammed840 642b01f
clippy fix
nurmohammed840 9b02d37
macro: ignore `;` span
nurmohammed840 5509860
macros: improve type diagnostics
nurmohammed840 42dce85
clippy fix
nurmohammed840 a9b59ef
macros: fix span of body variable
nurmohammed840 0824f9a
macro: fixed needless lint
nurmohammed840 309d653
macros: fallback to `async` block when method has `Self` keyword
nurmohammed840 7da2deb
macros: short-circuit to `async fn` when invoked from `#[tokio::test]`
nurmohammed840 05a2df7
macros: fallback to async block when fn signature contain `Self` keyword
nurmohammed840 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems that the double tokio::test attribute are now allowed?
tokio/tests-build/tests/fail/macros_invalid_input.rs
Lines 67 to 68 in d08578f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No user will receive a hard error as before. but the error message is slightly different.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, which is the new warning for this test function? The old version of the stderr file has an error referring to L67, but the new version has no error referring to L67-L69, which this test function contains.