-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat: Implements ord and partialord to timestamp #995
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -907,4 +917,38 @@ mod tests { | |||
// Must contain at least one "/" character. | |||
assert_eq!(TypeUrl::new("google.protobuf.Duration"), None); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
#[test] | |||
fn check_timestamp_ord() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe you could add a parameterized test. This way you could easily test many scenarios . Here is an example:
Lines 733 to 805 in a1ab898
fn check_duration_normalize() { | |
#[rustfmt::skip] // Don't mangle the table formatting. | |
let cases = [ | |
// --- Table of test cases --- | |
// test seconds test nanos expected seconds expected nanos | |
(line!(), 0, 0, 0, 0), | |
(line!(), 1, 1, 1, 1), | |
(line!(), -1, -1, -1, -1), | |
(line!(), 0, 999_999_999, 0, 999_999_999), | |
(line!(), 0, -999_999_999, 0, -999_999_999), | |
(line!(), 0, 1_000_000_000, 1, 0), | |
(line!(), 0, -1_000_000_000, -1, 0), | |
(line!(), 0, 1_000_000_001, 1, 1), | |
(line!(), 0, -1_000_000_001, -1, -1), | |
(line!(), -1, 1, 0, -999_999_999), | |
(line!(), 1, -1, 0, 999_999_999), | |
(line!(), -1, 1_000_000_000, 0, 0), | |
(line!(), 1, -1_000_000_000, 0, 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN , 0, i64::MIN , 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN + 1, 0, i64::MIN + 1, 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN , 1, i64::MIN + 1, -999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN , 1_000_000_000, i64::MIN + 1, 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN , -1_000_000_000, i64::MIN , -999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN + 1, -1_000_000_000, i64::MIN , 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN + 2, -1_000_000_000, i64::MIN + 1, 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN , -1_999_999_998, i64::MIN , -999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN + 1, -1_999_999_998, i64::MIN , -999_999_998), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN + 2, -1_999_999_998, i64::MIN + 1, -999_999_998), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN , -1_999_999_999, i64::MIN , -999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN + 1, -1_999_999_999, i64::MIN , -999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN + 2, -1_999_999_999, i64::MIN + 1, -999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN , -2_000_000_000, i64::MIN , -999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN + 1, -2_000_000_000, i64::MIN , -999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN + 2, -2_000_000_000, i64::MIN , 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN , -999_999_998, i64::MIN , -999_999_998), | |
(line!(), i64::MIN + 1, -999_999_998, i64::MIN + 1, -999_999_998), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX , 0, i64::MAX , 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX - 1, 0, i64::MAX - 1, 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX , -1, i64::MAX - 1, 999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX , 1_000_000_000, i64::MAX , 999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX - 1, 1_000_000_000, i64::MAX , 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX - 2, 1_000_000_000, i64::MAX - 1, 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX , 1_999_999_998, i64::MAX , 999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX - 1, 1_999_999_998, i64::MAX , 999_999_998), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX - 2, 1_999_999_998, i64::MAX - 1, 999_999_998), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX , 1_999_999_999, i64::MAX , 999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX - 1, 1_999_999_999, i64::MAX , 999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX - 2, 1_999_999_999, i64::MAX - 1, 999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX , 2_000_000_000, i64::MAX , 999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX - 1, 2_000_000_000, i64::MAX , 999_999_999), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX - 2, 2_000_000_000, i64::MAX , 0), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX , 999_999_998, i64::MAX , 999_999_998), | |
(line!(), i64::MAX - 1, 999_999_998, i64::MAX - 1, 999_999_998), | |
]; | |
for case in cases.iter() { | |
let mut test_duration = Duration { | |
seconds: case.1, | |
nanos: case.2, | |
}; | |
test_duration.normalize(); | |
assert_eq!( | |
test_duration, | |
Duration { | |
seconds: case.3, | |
nanos: case.4, | |
}, | |
"test case on line {} doesn't match", | |
case.0, | |
); | |
} | |
} |
@@ -2293,7 +2293,7 @@ impl NullValue { | |||
/// the time format spec '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%fZ'. Likewise, in Java, one can use | |||
/// the Joda Time's [`ISODateTimeFormat.dateTime()`](<http://www.joda.org/joda-time/apidocs/org/joda/time/format/ISODateTimeFormat.html#dateTime%2D%2D>) to obtain a formatter capable of generating timestamps in this format. | |||
#[allow(clippy::derive_partial_eq_without_eq)] | |||
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, ::prost::Message)] | |||
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, PartialOrd,::prost::Message)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file is generated, so your changes will be overwritten. Maybe you could add this to the generator so that all types can benefit from comparisons.
I believe this is the reason the CI tests fail
@@ -395,6 +395,16 @@ impl std::hash::Hash for Timestamp { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
#[cfg(feature = "std")] | |||
impl Ord for Timestamp { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe you could just #[derive(PartialOrd, Ord)]
on struct Timestamp
. At least your unit test succeeds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I noticed a potential issue in both the comparison logic when dealing with timestamps. For instance, when comparing:
Timestamp { seconds: 1, nanos: 0 }
to
Timestamp { seconds: 0, nanos: 1_000_000_000 }
The current/(and #[derive(Ord)]) implementation considers the first timestamp as greater than the second one. However, it's crucial to recognize that the second timestamp actually represents the same duration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a normalize function in Timestamp. I believe that does what you are looking for. https://docs.rs/prost-types/latest/prost_types/struct.Timestamp.html#method.normalize
@LevBeta Are you still interested in this PR? |
Related to #993