ASoC: Intel: soc-acpi-intel-lnl-match: add cs42l43 6x cs35l56 support

[bardliao]

This add a match for cs42l43 on sdw link 2, 3 cs35l56 on sdw link 1 and
3. All speakers are aggregated.

[bardliao]

@simontrimmer @rfvirgil I vaguely remember that you have a naming rule for acpi adr devices but I can't find it. Could you correct me if cs35l56_1_3amp_adr[] against the naming rule?

[simontrimmer]

Hi @bardliao I think the naming convention recollection you may be thinking of was this one:

commit a3003af
Author: Simon Trimmer simont@opensource.cirrus.com
Date: Fri Dec 6 15:59:02 2024 +0800

ASoC: Intel: soc-acpi: arl: Correct naming of a cs35l56 address struct

As there are many combinations these follow a naming scheme to make
the content of link structures clearer:

cs35l56_<controller link>_<l or r><unique instance id>_adr

Signed-off-by: Simon Trimmer <simont@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241206075903.195730-10-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Will have a look at the naming in a mo
-Simon

[simontrimmer]

cs42l43_amp_spkagg_ndpoints -> cs42l43_amp_spkagg_endpoints ?

[bardliao]

@simontrimmer Does it look good now?

[simontrimmer]

Hi @bardliao I don't have one of those boards but yes looks good to me!