Skip to content

Conversation

@evgeni
Copy link
Member

@evgeni evgeni commented Nov 11, 2025

What changes are you introducing?

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9; orcharhino 7.1 with Leapp)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.9.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Nov 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instructions that have a code block that follows usually end with a colon.

@pr-processor pr-processor bot added Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author and removed Not yet reviewed labels Nov 12, 2025
Co-authored-by: Maximilian Kolb <[email protected]>
@pr-processor pr-processor bot added Needs re-review and removed Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author labels Nov 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style-wise LGTM

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Nov 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants