Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Correct key names for protocol and port in target groups #320

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2023

Conversation

staticaland
Copy link
Contributor

@staticaland staticaland commented Nov 3, 2023

Description

Fixing some examples in the documentation. Correct key names for protocol and port in target groups.

Motivation and Context

The documentation is wrong and may cause confusion when upgrading to version 9.

It's easy to miss this because the examples silently fall back on defaults.

I suppose some type of validation could catch this earlier.

Breaking Changes

No.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • I have updated at least one of the examples/* to demonstrate and validate my change(s)
  • I have tested and validated these changes using one or more of the provided examples/* projects
  • I have executed pre-commit run -a on my pull request

Copy link
Member

@bryantbiggs bryantbiggs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@bryantbiggs bryantbiggs merged commit e3586dd into terraform-aws-modules:master Nov 3, 2023
9 checks passed
@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

This PR is included in version 9.2.0 🎉

Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 14, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants