Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BE/#249 Service 계층 @Transactional 설정 #250

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023
Merged

BE/#249 Service 계층 @Transactional 설정 #250

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023

Conversation

youKeon
Copy link
Collaborator

@youKeon youKeon commented Oct 1, 2023

🛠️ 변경사항

단순 조회 -> ReadOnly
저장, 수정, 삭제 -> 기본



☝️ 유의사항



👀 참고자료



❗체크리스트

  • 하나의 메소드는 최소의 기능만 하도록 설정했나요?
  • 수정 가능하도록 유연하게 작성했나요?
  • 필요 없는 import문이나 setter 등을 삭제했나요?
  • 기존의 코드에 영향이 없는 것을 확인하였나요?

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2023

Unit Test Results

88 tests  ±0   88 ✔️ ±0   5s ⏱️ -1s
19 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
19 files   ±0     0 ±0 

Results for commit 9b86f06. ± Comparison against base commit 2e1e8b8.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@kimhalin
Copy link
Contributor

kimhalin commented Oct 1, 2023

저도 이거 관련해서 고민이 돼서 글을 한 번 찾아봤었는데 혹시 이거 한 번 읽어보실래요?
https://velog.io/@gongel/Spring-Transactional-annotation-%ED%99%9C%EC%9A%A9
어떻게 생각하시는 지 궁금합니다!

@youKeon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

youKeon commented Oct 1, 2023

직관적으로 해당 메서드는 조회용임을 보여주고 싶어서 모든 메서드에 붙였는데 클래스 레벨에 붙여도 충분할 거 같네요!
좋은 자료 감사합니다 수정하겠습니다!!

@youKeon youKeon merged commit cb922ab into feature Oct 2, 2023
3 checks passed
@youKeon youKeon deleted the BE/#249 branch October 2, 2023 07:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants