- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 74
 
Update ecmarkup output to align more closely with ecma guidelines #661
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I will forever continue to chip away at this until we can publish a standard without someone giving me a page of bullet points that need fixing
| 
           Wish I knew where that draft copyright came from, but this seems fine.  | 
    
| width: 500px; | ||
| } | ||
| 
               | 
          ||
| .adoption-info { display: none; } | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Who is using this and what's it for? I don't see it in ECMA-262.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's the paragraph that says "This Ecma Standard was developed by Technical Committee NN and was adopted by the General Assembly of Month Year."
| title.innerHTML = restoreSuperScripts(title.innerHTML); | ||
| 
               | 
          ||
| rearrangeTables(); | ||
| formatCaptions(); | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why change the captions only for print? If Ecma guidelines have us using - instead of :, shouldn't that also apply to the web version?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Glad you brought it up 😁 I actually have a change in the actual figures in a follow-up PR. wanted this merged before I opened it.
I will forever continue to chip away at this until we can publish a standard without someone giving me a full page of formatting problems that need fixing.
Re the draft copyright: this is not an Ecma copyright. The only copyrights that shall appear on Ecma standards are found on the Ecma website, and they are the default copyright and the alternative copyright statement.