Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Numerically invert Jacobian in combined call #6223
Numerically invert Jacobian in combined call #6223
Changes from all commits
e442112
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add in the
CoordinateMap.hpp
docs for this function that we don't call the individualinverse_jacobian
functions and multiply them together, but rather just compute the jacobian and numerically invert it because most of our production time-dependent maps do this already.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason to keep the
inverse_jacobian
implementations on the individual maps at all? Doesn't need to be done in this PR, but removing them would be nicer than documenting that they are unused.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well they are still used in the individual
inverse_jacobian
function ofCoordinateMap{Base}
, correct? Whether or not that function is actually used in practice, I don't know. If not, then yes we can probably get rid of itThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or we could make it do the numerical inversion like this function now does.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah we could! Let's discuss on the Monday call
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another thing for a separate PR: this function could also return the Jacobian determinant. We need this a bit in the hydro cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From the Monday call: We can just numerically invert the jacobian in the individual function as well which means we don't need the individual
inverse_jacobian
functions. See #6233