Tray D-Bus Menu (fifth time the charm) #8920
Open
+1,486
−22
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Ian Fan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nathan Schulte <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Felix Weilbach <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Demi Marie Obenour <[email protected]>
Author
|
One thing which I am unsure about is the namings of the functions in |
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
|
When can we expect this feature to be merged? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I recently switched from i3 to sway and found out about the missing dbus menu support in swaybar (issue).
From what I understood, the initial implementation was done in #5161 then continued in #6249 then continued in #8405 then continued in #8698 🤔. However, it seems that the last two PRs (#8405 and #8698) are just people trying to rebase the PR to master, with some minor changes suggested in comments. I would like this to get merged so I decided to take ownership of this change and see it through the end.
In addition to the previous state, the following changes were added:
I have not reviewed all changes that are included in this PR since I saw that a lot of people already put a lot of work into that.
Let me know if I can do anything to speed up the review process or if I should adjust / fix any issues with this PR.