-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
add docs for graph package #603
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd the label Main to this PR to add it to the merge queue. You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ Deployment failed View logs |
supermemory-app | 1b9b301 | Dec 04 2025, 06:58 PM |
PR Review: Memory Graph DocumentationGreat work adding comprehensive documentation for the memory graph package! This is a significant improvement that will help developers integrate and use this component. Here's my detailed review: ✅ StrengthsDocumentation Structure
API Reference
Examples
🐛 Issues Found1. Type Inconsistency in API ReferenceLocation: The documented // Documented (api-reference.mdx)
memoryRelations?: Array<{
relationType: 'updates' | 'extends' | 'derives';
targetMemoryId: string;
}> | null;However, in // Actual implementation
updatesMemoryId?: string | null
nextVersionId?: string | null
relation?: "updates" | "extends" | "derives" | nullRecommendation: Update the API reference to match the actual 2. Security: API Key Exposure Warning Could Be StrongerLocation: Current warning: <Warning>
Never expose your Supermemory API key to the client. Always fetch data through your backend.
</Warning>Recommendation: Consider adding specific guidance: <Warning>
**Never expose your Supermemory API key to the client.** Always fetch data through your backend.
⚠️ Do NOT:
- Commit API keys to version control
- Use API keys in client-side code (React components, browser JavaScript)
- Include API keys in public repositories
✅ DO:
- Store keys in environment variables
- Use server-side API routes or backend proxies
- Add `.env*` to your `.gitignore`
</Warning>3. README Simplification May Have Removed Useful InformationLocation: The PR significantly simplifies the README (from 378 lines to 94 lines). While this improves readability, some useful information was removed: Removed content that might be valuable:
Recommendation:
Example addition: ## Documentation
📚 **[View Full Documentation](https://docs.supermemory.ai/memory-graph/overview)**
## Features
- 🎨 Canvas-based rendering for smooth performance
- 🔍 Interactive pan, zoom, and drag
- 🌐 Space filtering and search
- 📱 Responsive design (mobile & desktop)
- 📦 Zero configuration with automatic CSS injection4. Minor: Missing NPM Badge LinkLocation: The NPM version badge links to the package, but there's no direct "View on NPM" link. Recommendation: Add after the badges: [View on NPM](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@supermemory/memory-graph) | [Documentation](https://docs.supermemory.ai/memory-graph/overview)5. Code Example: Potential Issue with State ManagementLocation: In the mobile-responsive example: useEffect(() => {
const checkMobile = () => {
setIsMobile(window.innerWidth < 768);
};
checkMobile();
window.addEventListener('resize', checkMobile);
return () => window.removeEventListener('resize', checkMobile);
}, []);Recommendation: This will cause the entire graph to re-render when switching between mobile/desktop, losing zoom/pan state. Consider adding a note about this behavior or suggesting 💡 Suggestions for Improvement1. Add Troubleshooting SectionConsider adding a troubleshooting guide for common issues:
2. Performance Best PracticesAdd a dedicated section on performance optimization:
3. TypeScript Integration GuideAdd examples showing:
4. Accessibility ConsiderationsThe graph is canvas-based which can present accessibility challenges. Consider documenting:
🔒 Security Review✅ Good Security Practices
|
PR Review: Memory Graph DocumentationThis is an excellent documentation PR! The docs are comprehensive, well-structured, and provide great value to users. Here's my detailed feedback: ✅ StrengthsDocumentation Structure
Content Quality
Code Examples
🔍 Issues & Recommendations1. Security - API Key Exposure Warning
|
| Category | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation Quality | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Comprehensive and well-written |
| Code Examples | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Functional but minor error handling gaps |
| Type Safety | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Excellent TypeScript documentation |
| Security | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Warning present but could be more prominent |
| Performance Guidance | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Good coverage, could add more specifics |
✅ Approval Recommendation
LGTM with minor suggestions. This is high-quality documentation that significantly improves the developer experience. The issues raised are minor and can be addressed in a follow-up PR or before merge.
Before Merging:
- ✅ Verify README.md is fully updated (not truncated)
- ✅ Run
bun run buildin apps/docs to confirm no errors - 🔧 Consider: Add security architecture diagram to Quick Start
- 🔧 Consider: Enhance error handling in pagination example
Great work! 🚀
Merge activity
|
35434b2 to
1b9b301
Compare
Code Review - Memory Graph DocumentationSummaryThis PR adds comprehensive documentation for the @supermemory/memory-graph package. Overall, this is excellent work with well-structured, clear, and detailed documentation. The docs are developer-friendly and provide great practical examples. StrengthsDocumentation Quality:
Code Examples:
README Improvements:
Suggestions for Improvement
Nits (Very Minor)
Overall AssessmentQuality: 5/5 stars This is high-quality documentation that will significantly improve the developer experience. The suggestions above are mostly about adding extra safety guardrails and minor enhancements. The core content is excellent. Recommendation: Approve with minor suggestions The security callout about API keys is the most important addition. Everything else is optional polish. Great work! |


No description provided.