Code Refactoring Set-1: Decompose Conditional, Extract Method, Rename Variable #785
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



This PR introduces four targeted refactorings (via commits) to address code smells and improve code quality across the authentication, serialization, lobby, and factory modules.
Refactorings Applied:
1. Decompose Conditional - serializers.py
Problem: Complex nested conditional logic in the ResourceAccessSerializer.validate method made the code difficult to read and understand. The conditional combined update and create cases with multiple boolean expressions using nested and/or operators
Solution: Extracted helper methods to encapsulate distinct validation concerns:
_is_attempting_unauthorized_owner_assignment() - Checks if user is trying to assign owner role without permission
_is_attempting_to_remove_another_owner() - Checks if user is trying to modify a different owner
_violates_update_owner_rules() - Combines update-specific validation rules
_violates_create_owner_rules() - Handles create-specific validation rules
_raise_owner_permission_error() - Centralizes error raising
Benefit: Improved readability by replacing complex nested conditionals with well-named methods that clearly express intent. Each validation concern is now isolated and testable.
2. Extract Method - authentication.py
Problem: The authenticate_credentials method was 60+ lines long with multiple responsibilities: JWT decoding, claim validation, and user retrieval
Solution: Extracted three focused helper methods from the original implementation:
_decode_jwt_token() - Handles JWT token decoding and signature validation
_validate_token_claims() - Validates required claims (user_id, client_id, delegated flag)
_get_user_from_payload() - Retrieves and validates user from database
Benefit: Reduced main method to ~10 lines, improved code organization, and made each responsibility explicit and independently testable. The method now acts as a coordinator rather than implementing all details.
3. Rename Variable - lobby.py
Problem: Variable livekit_config was misleadingly named in the ACCEPTED status block (line 179) - it actually contains an access token, not configuration
Solution: Renamed livekit_config to access_token in the ACCEPTED status handling section of the request_entry method
Benefit: Eliminated confusion and improved code clarity by using a descriptive, accurate variable name that reflects the actual content (JWT access token)
4. Rename Variable - factories.py
Problem: Generic variable name item was used in both ResourceFactory.users() and RecordingFactory.users() post-generation methods, not clearly describing what it represents
Solution: Renamed item to user_entry in both factory methods to better convey that it represents either a User object or a (User, role) tuple
Benefit: Improved code readability and self-documentation. The variable name now clearly indicates it's an entry that can be either a single user or a user-role pair.
All test cases were successfully passed after the refactoring. The system was successfully run on local host after changes.
No changes to the functionality of the code have been made. Only refactoring to make the code easier to understand and maintainable.