Skip to content

✨ (backend) Improve AI prompts #1165

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

paultranvan
Copy link

Purpose

AI sometimes behave badly with the current prompts, especially for small LLM, i.e. with 7B parameters.

Proposal

After some empirical testing with Qwen2.5-7B and Lucie-7B, those prompts seem to have better success.

External contributions

Thank you for your contribution! 🎉

Please ensure the following items are checked before submitting your pull request:

  • I have read and followed the contributing guidelines
  • I have read and agreed to the Code of Conduct
  • I have signed off my commits with git commit --signoff (DCO compliance)
  • I have signed my commits with my SSH or GPG key (git commit -S)
  • My commit messages follow the required format: <gitmoji>(type) title description
  • I have added a changelog entry under ## [Unreleased] section (if noticeable change)
  • I have added corresponding tests for new features or bug fixes (if applicable)

AI sometimes behave badly with the current prompts, especially for small
LLM, i.e. with 7B parameters.

After some empirical testing, those prompts seem to have better success.

Signed-off-by: Paul Tran-Van <[email protected]>
@lunika
Copy link
Member

lunika commented Jul 11, 2025

Hi,

Thanks for your contribution. In the PR #1016 we are completely replacing this implementation to a new one. Can you take a look at the PR #1016 to see if your improvement can be added in it ?

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants