Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: integration tests setup #116
chore: integration tests setup #116
Changes from 1 commit
cd864ab
b9932de
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion Maybe let's put these all in one object (the return value of
await runWranglerDev()
), to make it clear that they all get set together. I had to read through the whole file a couple of times to understand what was setting these.Along those lines, let's separate the requested port (which is a constant) from the actual port, and stop providing default values for
ip
andport
. Right now, they're lying until Wrangler boots. If Wrangler's not up yet, we should signal that rather than provide fake values.One way to set this up (which might be overkill) would be to have
mochaGlobalSetup()
store the promise fromrunWranglerDev()
rather thanawait
it itself, and havegetWorkerInfo()
be async. Then the tests will start booting Wrangler and not wait for it to be set up until the values are actually requested. (We don't really have a performance issue here, though, so the choice should be down to which one communicates what's happening the clearest.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Let's avoid all these
let
s and put the stuff below inside thenew Promise()
. It'll have access toresolve
andreject
, and we don't need to tracksettledReadyPromise
at all:resolve
ing orreject
ing after it's settled is a noop.