Add manual workflow to deploy docker images to blockstack

[AshtonStephens]

Summary of Changes

Add manual docker image publishing

Testing

Risks

Few risks. It could provide faulty images and make people believe their code is broken when it's just the images.

How were these changes tested?

Tested on an x86 computer. Has issues with ARM64

What future testing should occur?

Should find a way to generate arm64 images.

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

[stjepangolemac]

How would this play out locally if we pull some changes, try spinning up devenv and the images are not built yet in the CI?

[AshtonStephens]

It would play out poorly - you would need to run ./build.sh locally to overwrite the ones here. For most users, this will be fine.

It might be worth making a separate devenv repo that doesn't only pulls in the images. At a point, our code should be stable

[CAGS295]

Is sbtc not in the matrix?

[AshtonStephens]

sBTC is above, because it's built with the sources here I put it separately.

[wileyj]

same question as @CAGS295 - is there a reason sbtc can't be added to this matrix that i'm not seeing here?
the build step looks compatible.

[CAGS295]

if: ${{ matrix.service }} != sbtc No?

[CAGS295]

I understand that the check means to only run if it is not sbtc. Otherwise, I don't understand the purpose of the if condition.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (66e9238) 41.03% compared to head (a906eec) 42.70%.
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #285      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   41.03%   42.70%   +1.66%     
==========================================
  Files          40       45       +5     
  Lines        5042     5290     +248     
  Branches        0       47      +47     
==========================================
+ Hits         2069     2259     +190     
- Misses       2973     3030      +57     
- Partials        0        1       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	76.61% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[wileyj]

Suggested change

	strategy:
	strategy:
	fail-fast: false
	max-parallel: 4 # or 8,10 etc

[wileyj]

some minor changes that might be good to make, but the workflow isn't complicated so I'll approve it. suggested changes/questions are not blockers

[friedger]

Is this good to merge?

[friedger]

@AshtonStephens This is still helpful for devenv when using nakamoto. Can we have docker images for the current state of stacks-blockchain node?

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.