Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create 2024-10-11.md #800

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions safety/2024-10-11.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# SPDX FuSa Meeting 2024-10-11

## Attendees
- Alfred Strauch
- Chuck Wolber
- Kate Stewart
- Steven Carbno

## Agenda
- Continue modeling discussion

## Notes
- Functional Assurance compared to functional safety?
- Context has having implications on the role type/action type/...
- Functional assessment interjecting derived requirements into the analysis.
- Hazard & Threat assessment burdens, what implications are being resolved.
- Assuring that the design matches the implementation; and encompasses what has been specified in the design in form of threat and hazard asssessment.
- Tire on car expample: parameters and processes are different than what's required for an airplane.
- Should the working group name be changed to functional assurance? Kate wants Nicole input here.
- https://basic-formal-ontology.org/ needs to be cross checked, to see if we should align in some areas.
- Requirements shall be desiged to be testable. Every row that is testable. Discussion around inheritance.
- Regulators may require tracing upwards, etc.
- Evidence fulfills multiple requirements; and there may be contexts around the test plans.