Conversation
At the W3C Solid Community Group call on the 11th April it was decided to include the spec editor and contributors to each of the Solid specification repositories. The editor is clearly the Solid Specifications Repository Manager. Please join to the conversation on what you think should be the criteria to be included as a contributor on solid/solid-spec#155 This is a good place to put your name if you would like to be included as a contributor to this repository.
|
I think @dmitrizagidulin should get listed as one of the authors and possibly also as previous editor. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
RubenVerborgh
left a comment
RubenVerborgh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Despite the name, this is not a spec, it is documentation.
Let us reserve the editor/author process for when we write the actual spec, in the solid/specifications repo.
Apart from that, this PR does not add names.
|
@RubenVerborgh - As you say, the repo name is confusing. Perhaps it might be worth renaming this and any others that foster similar confusion? |
kjetilk
left a comment
kjetilk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I tend to agree with @RubenVerborgh on this.
Perhaps "Contributors" is sufficient, or is it chiefly authored by just a small group of people who should (also) be listed as "Authors"?
6 participants
At the W3C Solid Community Group call on the 11th April it was decided to include the spec editor and contributors to each of the Solid specification repositories. The editor is clearly the Solid Specifications Repository Manager.
Please join to the conversation on what you think should be the criteria to be included as a contributor on solid/solid-spec#155
This is a good place to put your name if you would like to be included as a contributor to this repository.