initial commit for agent context around covered usage, started writin…

[latisaron]

…g around integration, logging level

As per ioquatix/ioquatix#39 I have opened up a pull request containing some MD agent-ready context.

Types of Changes

• New feature.

Contribution

• I added tests for my changes.
• I tested my changes locally.
• I agree to the Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1.

[ioquatix]

I think we can probably remove the implementation details and focus on the integration / usage.

I would then suggest adding a brief section on how to actually approach the problem of improving coverage - e.g. describe the process of running tests with coverage, identifying missing coverage, and then writing a test to cover it.

[latisaron]

Got it, will submit another draft either today or tomorrow.

[ioquatix]

For now, I think up until line 112 is good, we should not go into too much detail about the actual test frameworks IMHO.

[latisaron]

I also added a step by step explanation of how to iteratively improve a codebase s test coverage at the end.

I can remove anything related to testing frameworks and leave the main ideas behind;

If you're not okay with that I'll just leave it up to line 112

[ioquatix]

I think up to line 112 is good enough for now.

The reason why is I want to ensure these files remain focused, so that agents consult them + they should consult other test framework specific files on how to write good tests. If it turns out that this doesn't work well, we can revisit it. I'd rather start a little simpler and increase in complexity (entropy) as required.

Is that reasonable?

[latisaron]

Got it, yeah makes perfect sense, I'll update the PR, thanks for the explanation!

Let me know if you want me to rebase this into a single commit or anything of the sort.

[ioquatix]

Thanks! LGTM.