Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Firestore: Adjust rules for campaigns #961

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andrashee
Copy link
Contributor

@andrashee andrashee commented Dec 1, 2024

To get started with creating our own campaigns, it feels easiest to me, that we directly submit the filled out form to firestore, instead of looping it through a dedicated API backend.

I'm not giving any edit, read permissions. We can change that later down the road if we ever want to support that creators can edit their campaign.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new rule allowing unrestricted document creation in the campaigns collection.
  • Tests

    • Enhanced test coverage for Firestore rules with a new test suite for campaign rules, verifying creation permissions while restricting reading access.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 1, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
public ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 1, 2024 11:04am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 1, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new match rule in the Firestore security rules for the campaigns collection, allowing unrestricted document creation. Additionally, the test coverage for these rules is enhanced by adding a new test suite that verifies the permission to create documents in the campaigns collection while ensuring that reading those documents is not allowed. The modifications do not impact existing rules or tests related to other collections.

Changes

File Change Summary
firestore.rules Added a new match rule for campaigns allowing unrestricted document creation: allow create: if true;
shared/tests/firestore.rules.test.ts Enhanced test coverage with a new suite for campaign rules, verifying document creation permissions and read restrictions. Added imports for DocumentData and addDoc.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add additional fields to campaign model #946: The changes in this PR involve modifications to the campaigns data structure, which is directly related to the new Firestore rule allowing unrestricted document creation in the campaigns collection.

Suggested reviewers

  • mkue
  • socialincome-dev
  • ssandino

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
firestore.rules (1)

83-85: Consider adding separate rules for subcollections

The {document=**} pattern grants the same permissions to all subcollections. If campaigns will have subcollections in the future, they might need different access rules.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b967f4e and 241b15c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • firestore.rules (1 hunks)
  • shared/tests/firestore.rules.test.ts (2 hunks)

Comment on lines +83 to +85
match /campaigns/{document=**} {
allow create: if true;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add authentication and validation checks for campaign creation

The current rule allows anyone to create campaigns without authentication or data validation, which could lead to spam or abuse.

Consider this safer alternative:

    match /campaigns/{document=**} {
-     allow create: if true;
+     allow create: if request.auth != null 
+       && request.resource.data.keys().hasAll(['title', 'description'])
+       && request.resource.data.title is string
+       && request.resource.data.title.size() > 0;
    }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
match /campaigns/{document=**} {
allow create: if true;
}
match /campaigns/{document=**} {
allow create: if request.auth != null
&& request.resource.data.keys().hasAll(['title', 'description'])
&& request.resource.data.title is string
&& request.resource.data.title.size() > 0;
}

Comment on lines +118 to +127
describe('Test campaign rules', () => {
it('Permission to create campaigns, but not reading them', async () => {
const ref = await addDoc(collection(userAppAccess, CAMPAIGN_FIRESTORE_PATH), {
title: 'TestCampaign',
} as DocumentData);
expect(ref.id).toBeDefined();

await assertFails(getDoc(doc(userAppAccess, CAMPAIGN_FIRESTORE_PATH, ref.id)));
});
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance test coverage for campaign rules

The current test suite only covers basic create/read scenarios. Add tests for:

  1. Unauthenticated access
  2. Invalid campaign data
  3. Subcollection access
describe('Test campaign rules', () => {
  it('Unauthenticated users cannot create campaigns', async () => {
    const unauthStore = testEnvironment.unauthenticatedContext().firestore();
    await assertFails(addDoc(collection(unauthStore, CAMPAIGN_FIRESTORE_PATH), {
      title: 'TestCampaign',
    }));
  });

  it('Rejects invalid campaign data', async () => {
    await assertFails(addDoc(collection(userAppAccess, CAMPAIGN_FIRESTORE_PATH), {
      invalid_field: true,
    }));
  });
});

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2024

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit 241b15c):

https://si-admin-staging--pr961-ahee-campaign-fireba-opqyc8f1.web.app

(expires Sun, 08 Dec 2024 11:08:19 GMT)

🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎

Sign: b7b0969384059dce6ea8fad1ee1d1737e54e6676

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants