Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency com.slack.lint.compose:compose-lint-checks to v1.4.1 #1692

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

slack-oss-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot commented Oct 2, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
com.slack.lint.compose:compose-lint-checks dependencies minor 1.3.1 -> 1.4.1

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

slackhq/compose-lints (com.slack.lint.compose:compose-lint-checks)

v1.4.1

Compare Source

2024-10-02

  • Fix: Fix false positives reported by ComposeContentEmitterReturningValues.
  • Fix: Fix content-emitters configuration in docs.
  • Fix: Fix link to multipreview annotations in docs.

Special thanks to @​erikghonyan for contributing to this release!

v1.4.0

Compare Source

2024-10-01

  • New: Implement SlotReused lint. See https://slackhq.github.io/compose-lints/rules/#do-not-invoke-slots-in-more-than-once-place for more information.
  • Enhancement: Report the function name for readability in ComposeContentEmitterReturningValues.
  • Enhancement: Check for inherited @Preview annotations up to four levels.
  • Enhancement: Allow @VisibleForTesting/@TestOnly-annotated preview composables to be public.
  • Fix: Don't report duplicate errors about multiple content emitters.
  • Fix: Normalize lint option loading to match with individual issues.
  • Fix: Use name of parameter if text is not available.
  • Removed: Delete obsolete ComposeComposableModifier lint check.
  • Various docs fixes.
  • Build against Lint 8.7.0.
  • Update api and minApi to 16 (i.e. lint 8.7.0+). It's possible this may work with API 15 but we have not tested it.
  • Test against Lint 8.8.0-alpha04.
  • Test against K2 UAST.
  • Build against Kotlin 2.0.20.

Special thanks to @​alexvanyo, @​seve-andre, @​svenjacobs, @​ychescale9, @​shahzadansari, and @​kozaxinan for contributing to this release!


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 2, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 2, 2024
@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot force-pushed the renovate/com.slack.lint.compose-compose-lint-checks-1.x branch from 5b2f8cb to bd06068 Compare October 3, 2024 08:07
@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 3, 2024
@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot changed the title Update dependency com.slack.lint.compose:compose-lint-checks to v1.4.0 Update dependency com.slack.lint.compose:compose-lint-checks to v1.4.1 Oct 3, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 3, 2024
@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot force-pushed the renovate/com.slack.lint.compose-compose-lint-checks-1.x branch from bd06068 to 86f774c Compare October 4, 2024 08:07
@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot force-pushed the renovate/com.slack.lint.compose-compose-lint-checks-1.x branch from 86f774c to 4f94997 Compare October 5, 2024 08:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants